Loading…
Faithlife Study Bible
Restore columns
Exit Fullscreen

22:1–4 These verses address cases of property lost through theft, especially the theft of livestock. The fines required for theft were steep when the thief killed or sold the animal—five oxen to compensate for the theft of one—likely to serve as a deterrent against stealing property for profit. If the stolen animal was recovered alive, the penalty was paying double—presumably meaning the return of the stolen animal plus one more as a fine (compare vv. 7, 9).

Theft And Stolen Goods JE:DRHRLCJPETPD12V

22:1 slaughters it or sells it Selling or slaughtering the animal is proof that the theft was not impulsive; it was committed with the intent of financial gain. As a result, the compensation is well beyond the value of the item taken.

22:2 there is not bloodguilt Presumes a crime at night in contrast to v. 3, which specifies that the sun has risen. Since the resident would not know the thief’s intentions, killing the thief constitutes an act of self-defense. The resident is therefore not guilty of taking the man’s life.

22:3 bloodguilt If the homeowner kills the thief in daylight, he can be held liable for the thief’s life. Human life is valued more than property.

he will be sold The principle of restitution is now in effect: The thief must pay the victim the predetermined amount or be sold as a slave (see 21:2).

22:4 he will make double restitution While this could mean the thief had to give two animals in restitution in addition to returning the stolen animal, the parallel in Gen 43:12 suggests the sense is two animals in total.

22:5–15 These laws address property loss due to neglect or unforeseen circumstances (such as theft of borrowed property). Damage to agricultural products required repayment equivalent to what was lost (Exod 22:5–6). In some cases where the responsibility for property damage or loss was unclear, the parties were to bring their cases before God (or His human representatives) for a determination of guilt (vv. 8–9).

22:5 his vineyard The punishment is compensation for the victim’s financial loss. The loss was caused by negligence—the offender’s failure to control his livestock.

22:6 the one who started the fire Requires an equal compensation. Whether the cause was accidental or arson, the compensation is the same.

22:8 will be brought to the sanctuary If the thief is not found, the victim might assume that the person he entrusted is guilty. He then might be tempted to take the property of the one he assumes is guilty of the initial robbery. The Hebrew text here seems to suggest that in this breach of trust, both parties must submit to God’s justice by appearing before him or his representatives (v. 9). Some translations understand the Hebrew word ha'elohim, used here, to refer to judges, but there is no evidence that elohim (literally rendered as “God” or “gods”) itself ever means judges or even refers to human agents. At best, the meaning of judges can be inferred in the sense that they would function as earthly representatives of divine justice. See note on 21:6.

22:9 whomever God declares guilty In the Hebrew text, the subject of this phrase is elohim (see v. 8 and note). The noun elohim is grammatically plural and the verb used here is also plural. However, the plural is used elsewhere in passages where the subject is clearly the God of Israel (e.g., Gen 20:13; 31:53; 35:7; 2 Sam 7:23; Psa 58:11).

The idea of God condemning the guilty party recalls other contexts where God’s will was determined through casting lots (1 Sam 10:16–26; 14:42; Josh 7:14). Since the scenario here is very similar to the one that follows in Exod 22:10–11, God’s will may have been determined by an oath taken in the name of Yahweh.

22:11 the oath of Yahweh The Hebrew phrase shevu’ath yhwh (“oath of Yahweh”) means an oath invoking Yahweh as witness. The same phrase occurs in 2 Sam 21:7 (referring to 1 Sam 20:42) and 1 Kgs 2:43 (referring back to 1 Kgs 2:42) where the context is clearly an oath on the name of Yahweh.

22:13 indeed it was torn to pieces That is, wild predatory beasts, such as lions, which roamed the Levant until recent times (compare Judg 14:5–6; 1 Sam 17:34–37).

the mangled carcass If the animal was killed in a circumstance beyond the control of the accused, no restitution is required. Livestock scenarios are complicated, since the persons involved often are not present with the animals (compare Amos 3:12).

22:14 he will make restitution Negligence makes the person liable for restitution.

22:15 hiring fee The Hebrew word used here, sakhar, is related to the term sakhir, meaning “hired.” Though the noun sakhir usually refers to a hired person elsewhere, here it refers to the animal of the preceding verses. The lost animal was likely part of the hire, so no restitution is necessary.

22:16–17 This passage designates the penalty for a man who has seduced a virgin who has not been promised in marriage already. The verses follow the case law format that predominates in Exod 21:2–22:15, and they focus on the issue of compensation for loss—the common theme of the laws in 21:28–22:15. Many modern English translations mark a change in topic between v. 15 and 22:16, but the exchange of economic value was a key aspect of marriage in the ancient Near East, so this change in topic is not necessary. The loss of the girl’s sexual purity was viewed in the ancient Near East as significantly devaluing her worth as a potential bride. Thus, according to these laws, the man who seduced her must pay her father the bride-price, even if her father refused to give his daughter in marriage. If the girl had been promised in marriage to another, the penalty for the one who violated her was death, regardless of whether the encounter was consensual (Deut 22:23–27).

Marriage LTW

Marriage EDB

Marriage, OT NIDBV15

22:16 a man seduces a virgin Refers to seduction, not rape (for the latter, see Deut 22:25–27).

he surely will give her bride price Refers to a sum of money paid to the bride’s father to cover the loss since he is unable to offer her to other suitors. Occasionally, the bride-price was paid by acts of service (Gen 29:15–20, 27–28; 1 Sam 17:25; 18:20–27; 2 Sam 3:14; Josh 15:16–17; Judg 1:12–13).

Suitors paid the mohar under the assumption that the girl was a virgin. If a woman lost her virginity, she would have difficulty finding a husband, and the potential bride-price would be lost, as well.

22:18–23:9 This section of Exodus includes an eclectic assortment of regulations covering forbidden religious practices (Exod 22:18, 20), sexual depravity (v. 19), social justice (vv. 21–28), dedication of the firstborn (vv. 29–30), and honest and just treatment of all people (23:1–9). Although it is not clear what binds these particular laws together, they all do, in their own way, work to protect citizens from danger, particularly exploitation.

22:18 a witch The crime of sorcery is also referred to in the list of forbidden divination practices in Deut 18:9–14.

This law and its penalty likely refers to contact with gods besides Yahweh. Since this sin violated the highest commandment (to worship only Yahweh), it received the highest punishment.

Old Testament Theology and Divination

22:19 Anyone lying with an animal Refers to bestiality, which also is condemned in Lev 18:23; 20:15–16. In those passages, it is listed among the abominable practices of the residents of Canaan. This crime receives the death penalty. Its placement between laws concerning divination and sacrificing to another god may suggest a connection with the religious practices of neighboring communities.

22:20 the gods—not This highlights the polytheistic nature of the historical and religious context out of which Israel emerged. The law does not deny the existence of other gods; it does, however, assert that Yahweh is the only god that Israel is to worship. The worship of one particular god, without denying the existence of others, is called monolatry.

will be destroyed Violation of the first commandment receives the most severe penalty. The Hebrew verb used here, charam, refers to the act of setting someone or something apart as the sacred and exclusive property of a deity. This act frequently entails the destruction of the person or thing devoted to the deity. Destruction ensured the exclusive dedication to Yahweh. See note on Josh 6:17.

God also uses the verb charam when He instructs Israel through Moses to completely destroy certain cities and populations in the land of Canaan (Num 21:2–3; Deut 7:2; 13:15; 20:17). Joshua was charged with carrying out these instructions as well, and he did so (Josh 6:18–21; 8:26; 10:28–40; 11:11–21).

Charam NIDOTTE

Charam TWOT

22:21–27 These verses describe laws protecting certain social groups—such as foreign-born residents, widows, orphans, and the poor—from exploitation. These are the most vulnerable groups in society. The descriptions address the groups in both singular and plural terms, a pattern that follows the language of the Ten Commandments (Exod 20).

The reiteration of how vulnerable social groups should be treated suggests that exploitation was common in the ancient Near East. The laws regarding social justice go beyond avoiding oppression; they demand others to love vulnerable people as God loves them (Lev 19:33–34; Deut 10:18–19) by providing for their basic needs (e.g., Exod 23:12; Lev 19:9–10; Num 35:15; Deut 26:12–13; compare Prov 22:22–23; 23:10–11).

The ot laws protecting these social groups are aimed at individuals who are able to help, and the punishment that would come for abuse. Citizens should act with compassion as their God acted toward them when redeeming them from bondage (Exod 22:21)

Justice

22:21 you were aliens The memory of 400 years of slavery is often the given rationale for obeying the word of Yahweh (e.g., 20:2; Deut 5:15). Israel is not to oppress, because it too was oppressed. The memory of bondage in Egypt continues to play an active role in Jewish tradition, especially in the celebration of Passover (Exod 12–13).

22:22–24

These verses echo the story of the exodus out of Egypt and the punishment of Pharaoh’s armies. When the cries of the oppressed reached God’s ears, He acted, and began a series of events that led to the suffering of Egypt (2:23–25; 3:7–8; 7:14–15:21). The same fate is promised to those who oppress the most vulnerable in society—the fatherless and the widow.

22:24 I will kill you with the sword Imagery of God killing with the sword usually refers to His use of an invading army (e.g., Jer 5:14–19; 9:16), though sometimes the punishment originates within the community itself (e.g., Exod 32:27–29). In either case, the entire community is punished, not just the offenders.

22:25 you will not be to him as a creditor Several passages in the ot govern moneylending. This prohibition does not indicate that lending is forbidden; rather it likely forbids oppressive practices like harassment or intimidation associated with attempts to collect the debt (2 Kgs 4:1). The following verses provide an example of how lending should be done compassionately (Exod 22:26–27).

you will not charge him interest The Hebrew term used here, neshekh—derived from the word nashakh, meaning “to bite”—is the common term for requiring interest payments when money is loaned (see Deut 23:20; Psa 15:5). The law prohibits charging interest to a fellow Israelite who is poor (compare Lev 25:35–38; Deut 23:20–21; 24:10–13). This is gracious in comparison with other ancient Near Eastern law codes in which interest on agricultural goods begins at an average of 25%.

Israelites were forbidden from charging their kinsmen interest to reduce the risk that the debtor would have to sell himself into slavery to pay the debt (see Exod 21:2). However, the ot permitted charging interest from foreigners (Deut 23:20–21), and debts held by non-Israelites were not discharged in the Sabbatical year as they were for Israelites (Deut 15:1–3).

22:26

22:27

22:28 Both clauses in this verse address treating with contempt someone who should be respected or revered. The case of Naboth illustrates this crime and the penalty (although he was falsely accused; see 1 Kgs 21:1–16).

You will not curse God See note on Lev 24:11.

Blasphemy LTW

a leader The Hebrew term used here, nasi, refers to the leader of a clan. Before Israel’s monarchy, clan chiefs provided political and judicial leadership.

22:29 the firstborn of The consecration of the firstborn is first commanded just after the 10th plague against Egypt, the death of all their firstborn including livestock (Exod 12:29–32; 13:2, 11–16). The special status associated with being the firstborn is illustrated in God’s poetic statement that Israel is his firstborn of all the nations (4:22). This is also reflected in the dedication of agricultural firstfruits (vv. 29; 23:19; 34:18–20).

22:30 on the eighth This recalls the practice of circumcision. On the eighth day of life, a male child is physically marked as belonging to the people of God (Gen 17:12).

22:31 a carcass mangled in the field Wild predatory animals, such as lions, roamed the Levant until recent times (compare Judg 14:5–6; 1 Sam 17:34–37). Additionally, touching a dead carcass, let alone one torn by a wild beast, rendered a person ritually unclean (compare Lev 17:15; Judg 14:8–9).

FSB

About Faithlife Study Bible

Faithlife Study Bible (FSB) is your guide to the ancient world of the Old and New Testaments, with study notes and articles that draw from a wide range of academic research. FSB helps you learn how to think about interpretation methods and issues so that you can gain a deeper understanding of the text.

Copyright

Copyright 2012 Logos Bible Software.

Support Info

fsb

Table of Contents